Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Comparison between Network-Controlled Repeaters and Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2211.06974 v1 pith:M5ZCIK4U submitted 2022-11-13 cs.NI cs.ITeess.SPmath.IT

classification cs.NIcs.ITeess.SPmath.IT
keywords ncrsperformancedifferentintelligentintroducenetworknetwork-controlledreconfigurable
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Network-controlled repeater (NCR) has been recently considered as a study-item in 3GPP Release 18, and the discussions are continuing in a work-item. In this paper, we introduce the concept of NCRs, as a possible low-complexity device to support for network densification and compare the performance of the NCRs with those achieved by reconfigurable intelligent surfaces (RISs). The results are presented for the cases with different beamforming methods and hardware impairment models of the RIS. Moreover, we introduce the objectives of the 3GPP Release 18 NCR work-item and study the effect of different parameters on the performance of NCR-assisted networks. As we show, with a proper deployment, the presence of NCRs/RISs can improve the network performance considerably.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Optimal Planning for Heterogeneous Smart Radio Environments

    cs.NI 2024-11 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    MILP-based planning selects optimal mixes of RIS, STAR RIS, NCR, and 3SNCR to minimize cost or maximize coverage in an urban mmWave network.

Pith tools