Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

A taxonomic system for failure cause analysis of open source AI incidents

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2211.07280 v1 pith:EJHZUWCY submitted 2022-11-14 cs.AI cs.CY

classification cs.AIcs.CY
keywords incidentincidentsexpertknownsystemtaxonomicanalysiscauses
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

While certain industrial sectors (e.g., aviation) have a long history of mandatory incident reporting complete with analytical findings, the practice of artificial intelligence (AI) safety benefits from no such mandate and thus analyses must be performed on publicly known ``open source'' AI incidents. Although the exact causes of AI incidents are seldom known by outsiders, this work demonstrates how to apply expert knowledge on the population of incidents in the AI Incident Database (AIID) to infer the potential and likely technical causative factors that contribute to reported failures and harms. We present early work on a taxonomic system that covers a cascade of interrelated incident factors, from system goals (nearly always known) to methods / technologies (knowable in many cases) and technical failure causes (subject to expert analysis) of the implicated systems. We pair this ontology structure with a comprehensive classification workflow that leverages expert knowledge and community feedback, resulting in taxonomic annotations grounded by incident data and human expertise.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 6 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Underwriting the Agent Economy: The Blueprint for an AI Insurance Stack

    cs.CY 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5 of 10

    Affirmative AI-agent insurance with billion-scale limits is achievable by 2030 solely through coordinated industry build-out of an eight-component stack spanning data, CAT models, standards, contracts, underwriting, p...

  2. Reliability, Resilience and Human Factors Engineering for Trustworthy AI Systems

    cs.AI 2024-11 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A framework applying classical reliability, resilience, and human-factors engineering to AI systems, with a small subjective case study of OpenAI status incidents.

Pith tools