REVIEW 2 cited by
Towards Building Text-To-Speech Systems for the Next Billion Users
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Deep learning based text-to-speech (TTS) systems have been evolving rapidly with advances in model architectures, training methodologies, and generalization across speakers and languages. However, these advances have not been thoroughly investigated for Indian language speech synthesis. Such investigation is computationally expensive given the number and diversity of Indian languages, relatively lower resource availability, and the diverse set of advances in neural TTS that remain untested. In this paper, we evaluate the choice of acoustic models, vocoders, supplementary loss functions, training schedules, and speaker and language diversity for Dravidian and Indo-Aryan languages. Based on this, we identify monolingual models with FastPitch and HiFi-GAN V1, trained jointly on male and female speakers to perform the best. With this setup, we train and evaluate TTS models for 13 languages and find our models to significantly improve upon existing models in all languages as measured by mean opinion scores. We open-source all models on the Bhashini platform.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Domain-Specific Evaluation of Text-to-Speech Systems: A Multi-Metric Benchmarking Study
No single Urdu TTS system wins across all metrics, and the system listeners liked most, Google Gemini, was the furthest from reference audio on objective acoustic scores.
-
Technical report: Impact of Duration Prediction on Speaker-specific TTS for Indian Languages
In a five-language zero-shot TTS study, no single duration prediction strategy dominates: speaker-prompted durations help some languages, infilling durations help others, and results vary by metric.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.