Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Vision Transformers in Medical Imaging: A Review

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2211.10043 v1 pith:CB7KQKGG submitted 2022-11-18 cs.CV cs.AI

classification cs.CVcs.AI
keywords medicalimagingtransformervisioncomputertransformerscnnscomparing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Transformer, a model comprising attention-based encoder-decoder architecture, have gained prevalence in the field of natural language processing (NLP) and recently influenced the computer vision (CV) space. The similarities between computer vision and medical imaging, reviewed the question among researchers if the impact of transformers on computer vision be translated to medical imaging? In this paper, we attempt to provide a comprehensive and recent review on the application of transformers in medical imaging by; describing the transformer model comparing it with a diversity of convolutional neural networks (CNNs), detailing the transformer based approaches for medical image classification, segmentation, registration and reconstruction with a focus on the image modality, comparing the performance of state-of-the-art transformer architectures to best performing CNNs on standard medical datasets.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Hierarchical Deep Feature Fusion and Ensemble Learning for Enhanced Brain Tumor MRI Classification

    cs.CV 2025-06 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A ViT feature ensemble plus ML classifier voting pipeline is evaluated on two binary brain MRI datasets, reporting up to 99.8% accuracy without a same-dataset comparison against prior methods.

Pith tools