Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Contact Resistance Study of Various Metal Electrodes with CVD Graphene

Materials Science · Submitted 22 Nov 2022

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim The results presented in this work provide an overview for potential contact engineering for high performance graphene-based electronic devices.

how it is stated · asserted 0.50 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2211.12415 (version 1)
Pith IDKSOJURB5, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationAmit Gahoi, Andreas Bablich, Max C. Lemme, Satender Kataria, Stefan Wagner, Vikram Passi. "Contact Resistance Study of Various Metal Electrodes with CVD Graphene." arXiv:2211.12415 (2022). https://pith.science/paper/KSOJURB5
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,616 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.02 · states limitation 0.32 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.54 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.99 · compares with prior results 0.21 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

In this study, the contact resistance of various metals to chemical vapour deposited (CVD) monolayer graphene is investigated. Transfer length method (TLM) structures with varying widths and separation between contacts have been fabricated and electrically characterized in ambient air and vacuum condition. Electrical contacts are made with five metals: gold, nickel, nickel/gold, palladium and platinum/gold. The lowest value of 92 {\Omega}{\mu}m is observed for the contact resistance between graphene and gold, extracted from back-gated devices at an applied back-gate bias of -40 V. Measurements carried out under vacuum show larger contact resistance values when compared with measurements carried out in ambient conditions. Post processing annealing at 450{\deg}C for 1 hour in argon-95% / hydrogen-5% atmosphere results in lowering the contact resistance value which is attributed to the enhancement of the adhesion between metal and graphene. The results presented in this work provide an overview for potential contact engineering for high performance graphene-based electronic devices.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 In this study, the contact resistance of various metals to chemical vapour deposited (CVD) monolayer graphene is investigated. contribution 0.98 0.89 0.03 asserted 0.83
s1 Transfer length method (TLM) structures with varying widths and separation between contacts have been fabricated and electrically characterized in ambient air and vacuum condition. method 1.00 0.95 0.02 asserted 0.98
s2 Electrical contacts are made with five metals: gold, nickel, nickel/gold, palladium and platinum/gold. method 0.95 0.92 0.02 asserted 0.99
s3 The lowest value of 92 {\Omega}{\mu}m is observed for the contact resistance between graphene and gold, extracted from back-gated devices at an applied back-gate bias of -40 V. result 1.00 0.95 0.33 asserted 1.00
s4 Measurements carried out under vacuum show larger contact resistance values when compared with measurements carried out in ambient conditions. result 1.00 0.94 0.09 asserted 1.00
s5 Post processing annealing at 450{\deg}C for 1 hour in argon-95% / hydrogen-5% atmosphere results in lowering the contact resistance value which is attributed to the enhancement of the adhesion between metal and graphene. result 0.81 0.94 0.15 asserted 0.99
s6 The results presented in this work provide an overview for potential contact engineering for high performance graphene-based electronic devices. interpretation 0.93 0.36 0.39 asserted 0.50

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: empirical study 1.00 · evidence from observation or experiment 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

In this study, the contact resistance of various metals to chemical vapour deposited (CVD) monolayer graphene is investigated. Transfer length method (TLM) structures with varying widths and separation between contacts have been fabricated and electrically characterized in ambient air and vacuum condition. Electrical contacts are made with five metals: gold, nickel, nickel/gold, palladium and platinum/gold. The lowest value of 92 {\Omega}{\mu}m is observed for the contact resistance between graphene and gold, extracted from back-gated devices at an applied back-gate bias of -40 V. Measurements carried out under vacuum show larger contact resistance values when compared with measurements carried out in ambient conditions. Post processing annealing at 450{\deg}C for 1 hour in argon-95% / hydrogen-5% atmosphere results in lowering the contact resistance value which is attributed to the enhancement of the adhesion between metal and graphene. The results presented in this work provide an overview for potential contact engineering for high performance graphene-based electronic devices.

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.