Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Medical Image Segmentation Review: The success of U-Net

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2211.14830 v1 pith:4WVT2NWE submitted 2022-11-27 eess.IV cs.CV

classification eess.IVcs.CV
keywords u-netmedicalmodelimagesegmentationaddresscreatedfuture
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Automatic medical image segmentation is a crucial topic in the medical domain and successively a critical counterpart in the computer-aided diagnosis paradigm. U-Net is the most widespread image segmentation architecture due to its flexibility, optimized modular design, and success in all medical image modalities. Over the years, the U-Net model achieved tremendous attention from academic and industrial researchers. Several extensions of this network have been proposed to address the scale and complexity created by medical tasks. Addressing the deficiency of the naive U-Net model is the foremost step for vendors to utilize the proper U-Net variant model for their business. Having a compendium of different variants in one place makes it easier for builders to identify the relevant research. Also, for ML researchers it will help them understand the challenges of the biological tasks that challenge the model. To address this, we discuss the practical aspects of the U-Net model and suggest a taxonomy to categorize each network variant. Moreover, to measure the performance of these strategies in a clinical application, we propose fair evaluations of some unique and famous designs on well-known datasets. We provide a comprehensive implementation library with trained models for future research. In addition, for ease of future studies, we created an online list of U-Net papers with their possible official implementation. All information is gathered in https://github.com/NITR098/Awesome-U-Net repository.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Step towards Automated and Generalizable Tactile Map Generation using Generative Adversarial Networks

    cs.CV 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A Pix2Pix GAN trained on thousands of Google Maps street views reproduces API-styled tactile maps with high IoU/F1 and generalizes across zoom levels and world regions.

  2. CmFNet: Cross-modal Fusion Network for Weakly-supervised Segmentation of Medical Images

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    CmFNet combines separate CT and MR feature streams with a cross-modal stream and a hybrid scribble, regularization, and consistency loss to segment tumors and organs from scribble annotations, reporting gains over sev...

  3. Putting the Segment Anything Model to the Test with 3D Knee MRI - A Comparison with State-of-the-Art Performance

    eess.IV 2025-04 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    On meniscus segmentation from 3D knee MRI, end-to-end fine-tuned SAM matches 3D U-Net in Dice score but remains inferior in Hausdorff distance, while decoder-only SAM performs worse on both.

  4. A Study on the Performance of U-Net Modifications in Retroperitoneal Tumor Segmentation

    eess.IV 2025-02 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    ViLU-Net, a U-Net built with Vision LSTM blocks, reports the best segmentation scores on a new retroperitoneal tumor CT dataset and on FLARE22, but the comparison lacks error bars and omits the closest prior architecture.

Pith tools