RECORD
Risks to Zero Trust in a Federated Mission Partner Environment
Cryptography and Security · Submitted 30 Nov 2022
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim This paper explores risks associated with integrating multiple identity models and proposes two potential avenues to investigate in order to mitigate these risks.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
Recent cybersecurity events have prompted the federal government to begin investigating strategies to transition to Zero Trust Architectures (ZTA) for federal information systems. Within federated mission networks, ZTA provides measures to minimize the potential for unauthorized release and disclosure of information outside bilateral and multilateral agreements. When federating with mission partners, there are potential risks that may undermine the benefits of Zero Trust. This paper explores risks associated with integrating multiple identity models and proposes two potential avenues to investigate in order to mitigate these risks.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | Recent cybersecurity events have prompted the federal government to begin investigating strategies to transition to Zero Trust Architectures (ZTA) for federal information systems. | background 1.00 | 0.05 | 0.02 | asserted 1.00 |
| s1 | Within federated mission networks, ZTA provides measures to minimize the potential for unauthorized release and disclosure of information outside bilateral and multilateral agreements. | background 1.00 | 0.07 | 0.06 | asserted 0.99 |
| s2 | When federating with mission partners, there are potential risks that may undermine the benefits of Zero Trust. | background 0.82 | 0.11 | 0.11 | hedged possibility 0.98 |
| s3 | This paper explores risks associated with integrating multiple identity models and proposes two potential avenues to investigate in order to mitigate these risks. | contribution 0.98 | 0.74 | 0.28 | asserted 0.78 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v1
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
Recent cybersecurity events have prompted the federal government to begin investigating strategies to transition to Zero Trust Architectures (ZTA) for federal information systems. Within federated mission networks, ZTA provides measures to minimize the potential for unauthorized release and disclosure of information outside bilateral and multilateral agreements. When federating with mission partners, there are potential risks that may undermine the benefits of Zero Trust. This paper explores risks associated with integrating multiple identity models and proposes two potential avenues to investigate in order to mitigate these risks.
Human review
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.