Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Distilling Reasoning Capabilities into Smaller Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2212.00193 v2 pith:4HRWEWXQ submitted 2022-12-01 cs.LG cs.CL

classification cs.LGcs.CL
keywords modelsreasoningsmallercapabilitiesmodelproblemsocraticwork
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Step-by-step reasoning approaches like chain of thought (CoT) have proved to be very effective in inducing reasoning capabilities in large language models. However, the success of the CoT approach is fundamentally tied to the model size, and billion parameter-scale models are often needed to get CoT to work. In this paper, we propose a knowledge distillation approach that leverages the step-by-step CoT reasoning capabilities of larger models and distills these abilities into smaller models. In this work, we propose an alternative reasoning scheme, Socratic CoT, that learns a decomposition of the original problem into a sequence of subproblems and uses it to guide the intermediate reasoning steps. We use Socratic CoT to train a combination of two small distilled models: a problem decomposer and a subproblem solver. In practice, given a new problem, the two distilled models work in sync to decompose and solve complex problems. On multiple reasoning datasets (GSM8K, StrategyQA, and SVAMP), our proposed distillation strategies boosts the performance of smaller models over 70% compared to the baselines. Finally, we investigate when Socratic CoT is an effective alternative to CoT, demonstrating cases where a much smaller model (GPT-2 large) can outperform a 10X larger model (GPT-3 6B). Our code is available here: https://github.com/kumar-shridhar/Distiiling-LM

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Rationales Are Not Silver Bullets: Measuring the Impact of Rationales on Model Performance and Reliability

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Rationale-augmented finetuning can hurt accuracy while improving calibration, with the sizes of both effects tied linearly to task difficulty.

  2. Learning to Insert [PAUSE] Tokens for Better Reasoning

    cs.CL 2025-06 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    A likelihood-based [PAUSE] token insertion method for fine-tuning shows small gains on GSM8K and MBPP, but the AQUA-RAT result is unreliable because the test set contains training samples.

  3. Revisiting Test-Time Scaling: A Survey and a Diversity-Aware Method for Efficient Reasoning

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    ADAPT, a diversity-aware prefix fine-tuning method, improves best-of-N sampling efficiency for a 1.5B reasoning model, reaching 80% accuracy at N=32 versus N=256 for the baseline.

  4. SciGPT: A Large Language Model for Scientific Literature Understanding and Knowledge Discovery

    cs.CL 2025-09 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    SciGPT, a fine-tuned Qwen3 model for scientific literature, is reported to outperform GPT-4 on a new ScienceBench benchmark, but the evaluation is unreliable due to missing artifacts and contradictory numbers.

Pith tools