Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Learning Temporal Logic Properties: an Overview of Two Recent Methods

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2212.00916 v1 pith:ZCUCINDG submitted 2022-12-02 cs.LO cs.AIcs.FLcs.LG

classification cs.LOcs.AIcs.FLcs.LG
keywords examplesmethodtemporalformulasinferringlogicmethodsproblem
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Learning linear temporal logic (LTL) formulas from examples labeled as positive or negative has found applications in inferring descriptions of system behavior. We summarize two methods to learn LTL formulas from examples in two different problem settings. The first method assumes noise in the labeling of the examples. For that, they define the problem of inferring an LTL formula that must be consistent with most but not all of the examples. The second method considers the other problem of inferring meaningful LTL formulas in the case where only positive examples are given. Hence, the first method addresses the robustness to noise, and the second method addresses the balance between conciseness and specificity (i.e., language minimality) of the inferred formula. The summarized methods propose different algorithms to solve the aforementioned problems, as well as to infer other descriptions of temporal properties, such as signal temporal logic or deterministic finite automata.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Learning Linear Temporal Specifications from Demonstrations with Uncertainty

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Minimal LTL formulas can be learned from uncertain traces by Hamming-ball groups plus a Pseudo-Boolean optimization that forces at least one consistent estimate per group.

Pith tools