Pith. Sign in

RECORD

An Overview of Trust Standards for Communication Networks and Future Digital World

Information Theory · Submitted 3 Dec 2022

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Finally, we give our suggestions on the trust work that needs to be standardized in future.

how it is stated · asserted 0.70 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2212.01618 (version 1)
Pith IDV3PNE5YE, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationCheng-Kang Chu, Haiguang Wang, Huilin Wang, Tieyan Li, Xin Kang, Zhongding Lei. "An Overview of Trust Standards for Communication Networks and Future Digital World." arXiv:2212.01618 (2022). https://pith.science/paper/V3PNE5YE
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,075 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.24 · states limitation 0.08 · human participants 0.03 · controlled comparison 0.03 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.09 · compares with prior results 0.68 · mentions code or data availability 0.03.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

With the development of Information and Communication Technologies, trust has been applied more and more in various scenarios. At the same time, different organizations have published a series of trust frameworks to support the implementation of trust. There are also academic paper discussing about these trust standards, however, most of them only focus on a specific application. Unlike existing works, this paper provides an overview of all current available trust standards related to communication networks and future digital world from several main organizations. To be specific, this paper summarizes and organizes all these trust standards into three layers: trust foundation, trust elements, and trust applications. We then analysis these trust standards and discuss their contribution in a systematic way. We discuss the motivations behind each current in forced standards, analyzes their frameworks and solutions, and presents their role and impact on communication works and future digital world. Finally, we give our suggestions on the trust work that needs to be standardized in future.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 With the development of Information and Communication Technologies, trust has been applied more and more in various scenarios. background 1.00 0.05 0.02 asserted 1.00
s1 At the same time, different organizations have published a series of trust frameworks to support the implementation of trust. background 1.00 0.04 0.02 asserted 1.00
s2 There are also academic paper discussing about these trust standards, however, most of them only focus on a specific application. gap 0.90 0.09 0.03 asserted 0.99
s3 Unlike existing works, this paper provides an overview of all current available trust standards related to communication networks and future digital world from several main organizations. contribution 0.98 0.86 0.21 asserted 1.00
s4 To be specific, this paper summarizes and organizes all these trust standards into three layers: trust foundation, trust elements, and trust applications. method 0.60 0.94 0.12 asserted 1.00
s5 We then analysis these trust standards and discuss their contribution in a systematic way. contribution 0.50 0.93 0.05 asserted 0.96
s6 We discuss the motivations behind each current in forced standards, analyzes their frameworks and solutions, and presents their role and impact on communication works and future digital world. contribution 0.77 0.86 0.11 asserted 0.96
s7 Finally, we give our suggestions on the trust work that needs to be standardized in future. future work 1.00 0.89 0.22 asserted 0.70

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: review 1.00 · evidence from literature 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

With the development of Information and Communication Technologies, trust has been applied more and more in various scenarios. At the same time, different organizations have published a series of trust frameworks to support the implementation of trust. There are also academic paper discussing about these trust standards, however, most of them only focus on a specific application. Unlike existing works, this paper provides an overview of all current available trust standards related to communication networks and future digital world from several main organizations. To be specific, this paper summarizes and organizes all these trust standards into three layers: trust foundation, trust elements, and trust applications. We then analysis these trust standards and discuss their contribution in a systematic way. We discuss the motivations behind each current in forced standards, analyzes their frameworks and solutions, and presents their role and impact on communication works and future digital world. Finally, we give our suggestions on the trust work that needs to be standardized in future.

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.