Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Training quantum neural networks using the Quantum Information Bottleneck method

Quantum Physics · Submitted 5 Dec 2022

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We further provide algorithms for estimating the derivatives of the QIB function, showing that quantum neural networks can be trained efficiently using the QIB quantity given that the number of gradient steps required is polynomial.

how it is stated · asserted 0.91 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2212.02600 (version 2)
Pith IDTAVPAAGG, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationAhmet Burak Catli, Nathan Wiebe. "Training quantum neural networks using the Quantum Information Bottleneck method." arXiv:2212.02600 (2022). https://pith.science/paper/TAVPAAGG
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,775 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.06 · states limitation 0.80 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.95 · compares with prior results 0.07 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We provide in this paper a concrete method for training a quantum neural network to maximize the relevant information about a property that is transmitted through the network. This is significant because it gives an operationally well founded quantity to optimize when training autoencoders for problems where the inputs and outputs are fully quantum. We provide a rigorous algorithm for computing the value of the quantum information bottleneck quantity within error $\epsilon$ that requires $O(\log^2(1/\epsilon) + 1/\delta^2)$ queries to a purification of the input density operator if its spectrum is supported on $\{0\}~\bigcup ~[\delta,1-\delta]$ for $\delta>0$ and the kernels of the relevant density matrices are disjoint. We further provide algorithms for estimating the derivatives of the QIB function, showing that quantum neural networks can be trained efficiently using the QIB quantity given that the number of gradient steps required is polynomial.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We provide in this paper a concrete method for training a quantum neural network to maximize the relevant information about a property that is transmitted through the network. contribution 0.98 0.94 0.55 asserted 1.00
s1 This is significant because it gives an operationally well founded quantity to optimize when training autoencoders for problems where the inputs and outputs are fully quantum. interpretation 0.99 0.38 0.18 asserted 0.99
s2 We provide a rigorous algorithm for computing the value of the quantum information bottleneck quantity within error $\epsilon$ that requires $O(\log^2(1/\epsilon) + 1/\delta^2)$ queries to a purification of the input density operator if its spectrum is supported on $\{0\}~\bigcup ~[\delta,1-\delta]$ for $\delta>0$ and the kernels of the relevant density matrices are disjoint. contribution 0.49 0.95 0.13 asserted 1.00
s3 We further provide algorithms for estimating the derivatives of the QIB function, showing that quantum neural networks can be trained efficiently using the QIB quantity given that the number of gradient steps required is polynomial. contribution 0.83 0.93 0.28 asserted 0.91

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 0.99 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We provide in this paper a concrete method for training a quantum neural network to maximize the relevant information about a property that is transmitted through the network. This is significant because it gives an operationally well founded quantity to optimize when training autoencoders for problems where the inputs and outputs are fully quantum. We provide a rigorous algorithm for computing the value of the quantum information bottleneck quantity within error $\epsilon$ that requires $O(\log^2(1/\epsilon) + 1/\delta^2)$ queries to a purification of the input density operator if its spectrum is supported on $\{0\}~\bigcup ~[\delta,1-\delta]$ for $\delta>0$ and the kernels of the relevant density matrices are disjoint. We further provide algorithms for estimating the derivatives of the QIB function, showing that quantum neural networks can be trained efficiently using the QIB quantity given that the number of gradient steps required is polynomial.

Human review
How the literature uses it

What this paper does with the arXiv papers it cites

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

What it cites · 5 sentences without a confident label

Uses the method or tool of 1 paper

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.