Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Computational Reverse-Engineering Analysis for Scattering Experiments for Form Factor and Structure Factor Determination ('P(q) and S(q) CREASE')

Soft Condensed Matter · Submitted 6 Dec 2022

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim In this paper we present an open-source machine learning (ML) accelerated computational method to analyze small-angle scattering profiles [I(q) vs. q] from concentrated macromolecular solutions to simultaneously obtain the form factor P(q) (e.g., dimensions of a micelle) and structure factor S(q) (e.g., spatial arrangement of the micelles) without relying on analytical models.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2212.03154 (version 1)
Pith IDJDP7J6WH, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationArthi Jayaraman, Bhuvnesh Bharti, Christian M. Heil, Yingzhen Ma. "Computational Reverse-Engineering Analysis for Scattering Experiments for Form Factor and Structure Factor Determination ('P(q) and S(q) CREASE')." arXiv:2212.03154 (2022). https://pith.science/paper/JDP7J6WH
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,854 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.11 · states limitation 0.24 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.11 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.05 · compares with prior results 0.37 · mentions code or data availability 0.75.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

In this paper we present an open-source machine learning (ML) accelerated computational method to analyze small-angle scattering profiles [I(q) vs. q] from concentrated macromolecular solutions to simultaneously obtain the form factor P(q) (e.g., dimensions of a micelle) and structure factor S(q) (e.g., spatial arrangement of the micelles) without relying on analytical models. This method builds on our recent work on Computational Reverse Engineering Analysis for Scattering Experiments (CREASE) that has either been applied to obtain P(q) from dilute macromolecular solutions (where S(q) ~1) or to obtain S(q) from concentrated particle solution when the P(q) is known (e.g., sphere form factor). This paper's newly developed CREASE that calculates P(q) and S(q), termed as 'P(q) and S(q) CREASE' is validated by taking as input I(q) vs. q from in silico structures of known polydisperse core(A)-shell(B) micelles in solutions at varying concentrations and micelle-micelle aggregation. We demonstrate how 'P(q) and S(q) CREASE' performs if given two or three of the relevant scattering profiles - Itotal(q), IA(q), and IB(q) - as inputs; this demonstration is meant to guide experimentalists who may choose to do small-angle X-ray scattering (for total scattering from the micelles) and/or small-angle neutron scattering with appropriate contrast matching to get scattering solely from one or the other component (A or B). After validation of 'P(q) and S(q) CREASE' on in silico structures, we present our results analyzing small-angle neutron scattering profiles from a solution of core-shell type surfactant coated nanoparticles with varying extents of aggregation.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 In this paper we present an open-source machine learning (ML) accelerated computational method to analyze small-angle scattering profiles [I(q) vs. q] from concentrated macromolecular solutions to simultaneously obtain the form factor P(q) (e.g., dimensions of a micelle) and structure factor S(q) (e.g., spatial arrangement of the micelles) without relying on analytical models. contribution 1.00 0.91 0.46 asserted 1.00
s1 This method builds on our recent work on Computational Reverse Engineering Analysis for Scattering Experiments (CREASE) that has either been applied to obtain P(q) from dilute macromolecular solutions (where S(q) ~1) or to obtain S(q) from concentrated particle solution when the P(q) is known (e.g., sphere form factor). background 0.99 0.42 0.06 asserted 0.99
s2 This paper's newly developed CREASE that calculates P(q) and S(q), termed as 'P(q) and S(q) CREASE' is validated by taking as input I(q) vs. q from in silico structures of known polydisperse core(A)-shell(B) micelles in solutions at varying concentrations and micelle-micelle aggregation. method 0.66 0.90 0.13 asserted 1.00
s3 We demonstrate how 'P(q) and S(q) CREASE' performs if given two or three of the relevant scattering profiles - Itotal(q), IA(q), and IB(q) - as inputs; this demonstration is meant to guide experimentalists who may choose to do small-angle X-ray scattering (for total scattering from the micelles) and/or small-angle neutron scattering with appropriate contrast matching to get scattering solely from one or the other component (A or B). method 0.56 0.84 0.07 asserted 0.92
s4 After validation of 'P(q) and S(q) CREASE' on in silico structures, we present our results analyzing small-angle neutron scattering profiles from a solution of core-shell type surfactant coated nanoparticles with varying extents of aggregation. contribution 0.67 0.93 0.14 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 1.00 · evidence from simulation or computation 0.87.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

In this paper we present an open-source machine learning (ML) accelerated computational method to analyze small-angle scattering profiles [I(q) vs. q] from concentrated macromolecular solutions to simultaneously obtain the form factor P(q) (e.g., dimensions of a micelle) and structure factor S(q) (e.g., spatial arrangement of the micelles) without relying on analytical models. This method builds on our recent work on Computational Reverse Engineering Analysis for Scattering Experiments (CREASE) that has either been applied to obtain P(q) from dilute macromolecular solutions (where S(q) ~1) or to obtain S(q) from concentrated particle solution when the P(q) is known (e.g., sphere form factor). This paper's newly developed CREASE that calculates P(q) and S(q), termed as 'P(q) and S(q) CREASE' is validated by taking as input I(q) vs. q from in silico structures of known polydisperse core(A)-shell(B) micelles in solutions at varying concentrations and micelle-micelle aggregation. We demonstrate how 'P(q) and S(q) CREASE' performs if given two or three of the relevant scattering profiles - Itotal(q), IA(q), and IB(q) - as inputs; this demonstration is meant to guide experimentalists who may choose to do small-angle X-ray scattering (for total scattering from the micelles) and/or small-angle neutron scattering with appropriate contrast matching to get scattering solely from one or the other component (A or B). After validation of 'P(q) and S(q) CREASE' on in silico structures, we present our results analyzing small-angle neutron scattering profiles from a solution of core-shell type surfactant coated nanoparticles with varying extents of aggregation.

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.