Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

First De-Trend then Attend: Rethinking Attention for Time-Series Forecasting

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2212.08151 v1 pith:K6JSXW4A submitted 2022-12-15 cs.LG

First De-Trend then Attend: Rethinking Attention for Time-Series Forecasting

classification cs.LG
keywords attentiondomainsmodelsdifferentdomainforecastingtime-seriestrend
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Transformer-based models have gained large popularity and demonstrated promising results in long-term time-series forecasting in recent years. In addition to learning attention in time domain, recent works also explore learning attention in frequency domains (e.g., Fourier domain, wavelet domain), given that seasonal patterns can be better captured in these domains. In this work, we seek to understand the relationships between attention models in different time and frequency domains. Theoretically, we show that attention models in different domains are equivalent under linear conditions (i.e., linear kernel to attention scores). Empirically, we analyze how attention models of different domains show different behaviors through various synthetic experiments with seasonality, trend and noise, with emphasis on the role of softmax operation therein. Both these theoretical and empirical analyses motivate us to propose a new method: TDformer (Trend Decomposition Transformer), that first applies seasonal-trend decomposition, and then additively combines an MLP which predicts the trend component with Fourier attention which predicts the seasonal component to obtain the final prediction. Extensive experiments on benchmark time-series forecasting datasets demonstrate that TDformer achieves state-of-the-art performance against existing attention-based models.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. How (Not) to Hybridize Neural and Mechanistic Models for Epidemiological Forecasting

    cs.LG 2026-02 reject novelty 5.0

    EpiNode—a VMD-decomposed, three-latent-ODE SIRS hybrid—is reported to cut long-horizon RMSE by 15–35% and improve peak timing on seasonal and non-seasonal epidemic data, though a key forecast step is unspecified.

  2. Revisiting Long-term Time Series Forecasting: An Investigation on Linear Mapping

    cs.LG 2023-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Affine mapping dominates LTSF benchmarks by learning similar input-to-output transition matrices, captures periodic signals well but struggles with non-periodic or cross-channel varying periods; reversible normalizati...