Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Provable Fairness for Neural Network Models using Formal Verification

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2212.08578 v1 pith:2ZVBQWVX submitted 2022-12-16 cs.LG cs.CY

classification cs.LGcs.CY
keywords fairnessdatatrainingevaluationformalmodelsmethodsmodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Machine learning models are increasingly deployed for critical decision-making tasks, making it important to verify that they do not contain gender or racial biases picked up from training data. Typical approaches to achieve fairness revolve around efforts to clean or curate training data, with post-hoc statistical evaluation of the fairness of the model on evaluation data. In contrast, we propose techniques to \emph{prove} fairness using recently developed formal methods that verify properties of neural network models.Beyond the strength of guarantee implied by a formal proof, our methods have the advantage that we do not need explicit training or evaluation data (which is often proprietary) in order to analyze a given trained model. In experiments on two familiar datasets in the fairness literature (COMPAS and ADULTS), we show that through proper training, we can reduce unfairness by an average of 65.4\% at a cost of less than 1\% in AUC score.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Justified Evidence Collection for Argument-based AI Fairness Assurance

    cs.HC 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The paper introduces a dynamic argument-based assurance framework that gathers evidence from model, data, and use case transparency artefacts to support fairness claims, illustrated on a finance sentiment analysis use case.

Pith tools