RECORD
Fock space representations of Bogolyubov transformations as spin representations
Nuclear Theory · Submitted 16 Dec 2022
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim The representation on a Fock space of the group of Bogolyubov transformations is recognized as the spin representation of an orthogonal group.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
The representation on a Fock space of the group of Bogolyubov transformations is recognized as the spin representation of an orthogonal group. Derivations based on this observation of some known formulas for the overlap amplitude of two Bogolyubov quasi-fermion vacuum states that are in some cases more complete than those in the literature are shown. It is pointed out that the name of an "Onishi formula" is assigned in the literature to two different expressions which are related but have different scopes. One of them has what has been described as a sign problem, the other one, due to Onishi and Yoshida, has a more limited scope and no sign problem. I give a short proof of the latter, whose derivation is missing in the paper by Onishi and Yoshida, and a new, combinatoric, proof of an equivalent formula recently derived by Robledo.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | The representation on a Fock space of the group of Bogolyubov transformations is recognized as the spin representation of an orthogonal group. | background 0.81 | 0.13 | 0.69 | asserted 1.00 |
| s1 | Derivations based on this observation of some known formulas for the overlap amplitude of two Bogolyubov quasi-fermion vacuum states that are in some cases more complete than those in the literature are shown. | contribution 0.89 | 0.87 | 0.17 | asserted 1.00 |
| s2 | It is pointed out that the name of an "Onishi formula" is assigned in the literature to two different expressions which are related but have different scopes. | background 0.47 | 0.24 | 0.08 | asserted 1.00 |
| s3 | One of them has what has been described as a sign problem, the other one, due to Onishi and Yoshida, has a more limited scope and no sign problem. | background 0.89 | 0.10 | 0.07 | asserted 1.00 |
| s4 | I give a short proof of the latter, whose derivation is missing in the paper by Onishi and Yoshida, and a new, combinatoric, proof of an equivalent formula recently derived by Robledo. | contribution 1.00 | 0.95 | 0.14 | asserted 1.00 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v4
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
The representation on a Fock space of the group of Bogolyubov transformations is recognized as the spin representation of an orthogonal group. Derivations based on this observation of some known formulas for the overlap amplitude of two Bogolyubov quasi-fermion vacuum states that are in some cases more complete than those in the literature are shown. It is pointed out that the name of an "Onishi formula" is assigned in the literature to two different expressions which are related but have different scopes. One of them has what has been described as a sign problem, the other one, due to Onishi and Yoshida, has a more limited scope and no sign problem. I give a short proof of the latter, whose derivation is missing in the paper by Onishi and Yoshida, and a new, combinatoric, proof of an equivalent formula recently derived by Robledo.
Human review
How the literature uses it
1 arXiv paper cite this in 1 sentence
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.