Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Towards Understanding the Impacts of Textual Dissimilarity on Duplicate Bug Report Detection

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2212.09976 v1 pith:MEDSR5FU submitted 2022-12-20 cs.SE

Towards Understanding the Impacts of Textual Dissimilarity on Duplicate Bug Report Detection

classification cs.SE
keywords reportsduplicatetextuallydissimilartechniquesdetectingdetectionperformance
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

About 40% of software bug reports are duplicates of one another, which pose a major overhead during software maintenance. Traditional techniques often focus on detecting duplicate bug reports that are textually similar. However, in bug tracking systems, many duplicate bug reports might not be textually similar, for which the traditional techniques might fall short. In this paper, we conduct a large-scale empirical study to better understand the impacts of textual dissimilarity on the detection of duplicate bug reports. First, we collect a total of 92,854 bug reports from three open-source systems and construct two datasets containing textually similar and textually dissimilar duplicate bug reports. Then we determine the performance of three existing techniques in detecting duplicate bug reports and show that their performance is significantly poor for textually dissimilar duplicate reports. Second, we analyze the two groups of bug reports using a combination of descriptive analysis, word embedding visualization, and manual analysis. We found that textually dissimilar duplicate bug reports often miss important components (e.g., expected behaviors and steps to reproduce), which could lead to their textual differences and poor performance by the existing techniques. Finally, we apply domain-specific embedding to duplicate bug report detection problems, which shows mixed results. All these findings above warrant further investigation and more effective solutions for detecting textually dissimilar duplicate bug reports.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.