Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

LAMBADA: Backward Chaining for Automated Reasoning in Natural Language

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2212.13894 v2 pith:XAGVJJPQ submitted 2022-12-20 cs.AI cs.LG

classification cs.AIcs.LG
keywords reasoningautomatedbackwardlambadaaxiomschainingchainsconclusion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Remarkable progress has been made on automated reasoning with natural text, by using Language Models (LMs) and methods such as Chain-of-Thought and Selection-Inference. These techniques search for proofs in the forward direction from axioms to the conclusion, which suffers from a combinatorial explosion of the search space, and thus high failure rates for problems requiring longer chains of reasoning. The classical automated reasoning literature has shown that reasoning in the backward direction (i.e. from the intended conclusion to supporting axioms) is significantly more efficient at proof-finding. Importing this intuition into the LM setting, we develop a Backward Chaining algorithm, called LAMBADA, that decomposes reasoning into four sub-modules. These sub-modules are simply implemented by few-shot prompted LM inference. We show that LAMBADA achieves sizable accuracy boosts over state-of-the-art forward reasoning methods on challenging logical reasoning datasets, particularly when deep and accurate proof chains are required.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. S$^2$-MAD: Breaking the Token Barrier to Enhance Multi-Agent Debate Efficiency

    cs.CL 2025-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    S2-MAD's decision mechanism filters redundant viewpoints and conditionally skips participation, cutting token costs by up to 94.5% versus standard multi-agent debate while keeping accuracy within about 2 points in the...

Pith tools