Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Sample-to-sample fluctuations of transport coefficients in the totally asymmetric simple exclusion process with quenched disorder

Statistical Mechanics · Submitted 2 Jan 2023

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim As a result, the maximal current and the diffusion coefficient depend crucially on the disorder, i.e., non-self-averaging.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2301.00563 (version 3)
Pith IDOJQRP44R, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationIssei Sakai, Takuma Akimoto. "Sample-to-sample fluctuations of transport coefficients in the totally asymmetric simple exclusion process with quenched disorder." arXiv:2301.00563 (2023). https://pith.science/paper/OJQRP44R
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 8,673 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.35 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.58 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.76 · compares with prior results 0.74 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v3. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We consider the totally asymmetric simple exclusion processes on quenched random energy landscapes. We show that the current and the diffusion coefficient differ from those for homogeneous environments. Using the mean-field approximation, we analytically obtain the site density when the particle density is low or high. As a result, the current and the diffusion coefficient are described by the dilute limit of particles or holes, respectively. However, in the intermediate regime, due to the many-body effect, the current and the diffusion coefficient differ from those for single-particle dynamics. The current is almost constant and becomes the maximal value in the intermediate regime. Moreover, the diffusion coefficient decreases with the particle density in the intermediate regime. We obtain analytical expressions for the maximal current and the diffusion coefficient based on the renewal theory. The deepest energy depth plays a central role in determining the maximal current and the diffusion coefficient. As a result, the maximal current and the diffusion coefficient depend crucially on the disorder, i.e., non-self-averaging. Based on the extreme value theory, we find that sample-to-sample fluctuations of the maximal current and diffusion coefficient are characterized by the Weibull distribution. We show that the disorder averages of the maximal current and the diffusion coefficient converge to zero as the system size is increased and quantify the degree of the non-self-averaging effect for the maximal current and the diffusion coefficient.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We consider the totally asymmetric simple exclusion processes on quenched random energy landscapes. background 0.68 0.48 0.02 asserted 0.72
s1 We show that the current and the diffusion coefficient differ from those for homogeneous environments. result 0.97 0.91 0.18 asserted 1.00
s2 Using the mean-field approximation, we analytically obtain the site density when the particle density is low or high. method 0.79 0.96 0.04 asserted 1.00
s3 As a result, the current and the diffusion coefficient are described by the dilute limit of particles or holes, respectively. result 0.88 0.87 0.11 asserted 1.00
s4 However, in the intermediate regime, due to the many-body effect, the current and the diffusion coefficient differ from those for single-particle dynamics. result 0.95 0.78 0.10 asserted 1.00
s5 The current is almost constant and becomes the maximal value in the intermediate regime. result 1.00 0.89 0.11 asserted 0.98
s6 Moreover, the diffusion coefficient decreases with the particle density in the intermediate regime. result 1.00 0.87 0.08 asserted 1.00
s7 We obtain analytical expressions for the maximal current and the diffusion coefficient based on the renewal theory. contribution 0.38 0.96 0.10 asserted 1.00
s8 The deepest energy depth plays a central role in determining the maximal current and the diffusion coefficient. result 0.71 0.79 0.18 asserted 1.00
s9 As a result, the maximal current and the diffusion coefficient depend crucially on the disorder, i.e., non-self-averaging. interpretation 0.68 0.83 0.41 asserted 1.00
s10 Based on the extreme value theory, we find that sample-to-sample fluctuations of the maximal current and diffusion coefficient are characterized by the Weibull distribution. result 0.97 0.95 0.29 asserted 1.00
s11 We show that the disorder averages of the maximal current and the diffusion coefficient converge to zero as the system size is increased and quantify the degree of the non-self-averaging effect for the maximal current and the diffusion coefficient. result 0.99 0.95 0.34 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v3
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We consider the totally asymmetric simple exclusion processes on quenched random energy landscapes. We show that the current and the diffusion coefficient differ from those for homogeneous environments. Using the mean-field approximation, we analytically obtain the site density when the particle density is low or high. As a result, the current and the diffusion coefficient are described by the dilute limit of particles or holes, respectively. However, in the intermediate regime, due to the many-body effect, the current and the diffusion coefficient differ from those for single-particle dynamics. The current is almost constant and becomes the maximal value in the intermediate regime. Moreover, the diffusion coefficient decreases with the particle density in the intermediate regime. We obtain analytical expressions for the maximal current and the diffusion coefficient based on the renewal theory. The deepest energy depth plays a central role in determining the maximal current and the diffusion coefficient. As a result, the maximal current and the diffusion coefficient depend crucially on the disorder, i.e., non-self-averaging. Based on the extreme value theory, we find that sample-to-sample fluctuations of the maximal current and diffusion coefficient are characterized by the Weibull distribution. We show that the disorder averages of the maximal current and the diffusion coefficient converge to zero as the system size is increased and quantify the degree of the non-self-averaging effect for the maximal current and the diffusion coefficient.

Human review
How the literature uses it

1 arXiv paper cite this in 1 sentence

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

What it cites · 2 sentences without a confident label

Builds on 1 paper

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.