Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Transfer learning for conflict and duplicate detection in software requirement pairs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2301.03709 v3 pith:HNZ3NOMX submitted 2023-01-09 cs.SE cs.LG

classification cs.SEcs.LG
keywords conflictduplicatesoftwaredetectionmodelsdatasetsperformancerequirement
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Consistent and holistic expression of software requirements is important for the success of software projects. In this study, we aim to enhance the efficiency of the software development processes by automatically identifying conflicting and duplicate software requirement specifications. We formulate the conflict and duplicate detection problem as a requirement pair classification task. We design a novel transformers-based architecture, SR-BERT, which incorporates Sentence-BERT and Bi-encoders for the conflict and duplicate identification task. Furthermore, we apply supervised multi-stage fine-tuning to the pre-trained transformer models. We test the performance of different transfer models using four different datasets. We find that sequentially trained and fine-tuned transformer models perform well across the datasets with SR-BERT achieving the best performance for larger datasets. We also explore the cross-domain performance of conflict detection models and adopt a rule-based filtering approach to validate the model classifications. Our analysis indicates that the sentence pair classification approach and the proposed transformer-based natural language processing strategies can contribute significantly to achieving automation in conflict and duplicate detection

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Generative Language Models Potential for Requirement Engineering Applications: Insights into Current Strengths and Limitations

    cs.SE 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    ChatGPT and Gemini generally underperform task-specific models on requirements engineering benchmarks, except ChatGPT achieves a new top F1 score on the REQuestA question answering dataset.

Pith tools