REVIEW 2 cited by
Tracr: Compiled Transformers as a Laboratory for Interpretability
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We show how to "compile" human-readable programs into standard decoder-only transformer models. Our compiler, Tracr, generates models with known structure. This structure can be used to design experiments. For example, we use it to study "superposition" in transformers that execute multi-step algorithms. Additionally, the known structure of Tracr-compiled models can serve as ground-truth for evaluating interpretability methods. Commonly, because the "programs" learned by transformers are unknown it is unclear whether an interpretation succeeded. We demonstrate our approach by implementing and examining programs including computing token frequencies, sorting, and parenthesis checking. We provide an open-source implementation of Tracr at https://github.com/google-deepmind/tracr.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Input Pathways Shape Few-Shot, Not Zero-Shot, Binding in Tiny Transformers: A Fully-Enumerable Study
In information-matched tiny transformers, zero-shot compositional binding fails for every route, while few-shot efficiency is governed by input-pathway sharing and code readability.
-
ALPS: Attention Localization and Pruning Strategy for Efficient Alignment of Large Language Models
ALPS selects task-sensitive attention heads by measuring Wasserstein distance between base and task-tuned weights, and freezing other heads during fine-tuning improves performance and efficiency.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.