Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Quantum Computing Techniques for Multi-Knapsack Problems

Quantum Physics · Submitted 13 Jan 2023

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim In addition to the high demand for better quantum hardware, our results also emphasize the necessity of more and better quantum optimization algorithms, especially for multi-knapsack problems.

how it is stated · asserted 0.96 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2301.05750 (version 2)
Pith IDSTV4PJ62, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationAbhishek Awasthi, Andre Luckow, Christoph Niedermeier, Francesco B\"ar, Hans Ehm, Hila Safi, Janik Sch\"onmeier-Kromer, Johannes Klepsch, Joseph Doetsch, Karen Wintersperger, Lilly Palackal, Marvin Erdmann, Maximilian Hess, Oliver von Sicard, Peter A. Limacher, Philipp Ross, Ruben Pfeiffer, Sheir Yarkoni, Yannick Wenger. "Quantum Computing Techniques for Multi-Knapsack Problems." arXiv:2301.05750 (2023). https://pith.science/paper/STV4PJ62
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,213 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.45 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.15 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.05 · compares with prior results 0.70 · mentions code or data availability 0.03.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Optimization problems are ubiquitous in various industrial settings, and multi-knapsack optimization is one recurrent task faced daily by several industries. The advent of quantum computing has opened a new paradigm for computationally intensive tasks, with promises of delivering better and faster solutions for specific classes of problems. This work presents a comprehensive study of quantum computing approaches for multi-knapsack problems, by investigating some of the most prominent and state-of-the-art quantum algorithms using different quantum software and hardware tools. The performance of the quantum approaches is compared for varying hyperparameters. We consider several gate-based quantum algorithms, such as QAOA and VQE, as well as quantum annealing, and present an exhaustive study of the solutions and the estimation of runtimes. Additionally, we analyze the impact of warm-starting QAOA to understand the reasons for the better performance of this approach. We discuss the implications of our results in view of utilizing quantum optimization for industrial applications in the future. In addition to the high demand for better quantum hardware, our results also emphasize the necessity of more and better quantum optimization algorithms, especially for multi-knapsack problems.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Optimization problems are ubiquitous in various industrial settings, and multi-knapsack optimization is one recurrent task faced daily by several industries. background 1.00 0.03 0.02 asserted 1.00
s1 The advent of quantum computing has opened a new paradigm for computationally intensive tasks, with promises of delivering better and faster solutions for specific classes of problems. background 1.00 0.04 0.03 hedged possibility 0.57
s2 This work presents a comprehensive study of quantum computing approaches for multi-knapsack problems, by investigating some of the most prominent and state-of-the-art quantum algorithms using different quantum software and hardware tools. contribution 1.00 0.90 0.05 asserted 0.98
s3 The performance of the quantum approaches is compared for varying hyperparameters. method 0.90 0.88 0.04 asserted 0.95
s4 We consider several gate-based quantum algorithms, such as QAOA and VQE, as well as quantum annealing, and present an exhaustive study of the solutions and the estimation of runtimes. method 0.71 0.93 0.06 asserted 0.98
s5 Additionally, we analyze the impact of warm-starting QAOA to understand the reasons for the better performance of this approach. contribution 0.62 0.93 0.08 asserted 0.71
s6 We discuss the implications of our results in view of utilizing quantum optimization for industrial applications in the future. interpretation 0.94 0.53 0.14 unclear 0.49
s7 In addition to the high demand for better quantum hardware, our results also emphasize the necessity of more and better quantum optimization algorithms, especially for multi-knapsack problems. interpretation 0.68 0.58 0.60 asserted 0.96

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: empirical study 0.61 · evidence from simulation or computation 0.92.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Optimization problems are ubiquitous in various industrial settings, and multi-knapsack optimization is one recurrent task faced daily by several industries. The advent of quantum computing has opened a new paradigm for computationally intensive tasks, with promises of delivering better and faster solutions for specific classes of problems. This work presents a comprehensive study of quantum computing approaches for multi-knapsack problems, by investigating some of the most prominent and state-of-the-art quantum algorithms using different quantum software and hardware tools. The performance of the quantum approaches is compared for varying hyperparameters. We consider several gate-based quantum algorithms, such as QAOA and VQE, as well as quantum annealing, and present an exhaustive study of the solutions and the estimation of runtimes. Additionally, we analyze the impact of warm-starting QAOA to understand the reasons for the better performance of this approach. We discuss the implications of our results in view of utilizing quantum optimization for industrial applications in the future. In addition to the high demand for better quantum hardware, our results also emphasize the necessity of more and better quantum optimization algorithms, especially for multi-knapsack problems.

Human review
How the literature uses it

3 arXiv papers cite this in 6 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 3 sentences without a confident label

Cites it as support 1 paper
Cites it as background 2 papers

What it cites · 2 sentences without a confident label

Cites as background 2 papers
  • Two techniques that are built upon the quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) are introduced in [ref] : one of them “warm-starts” the quantum optimization algorithm by seeding it with an initial solution using a greedy classical method, and the other uses special mixing Hamiltonians to improve the exploration of the solution space.

    Quantum Optimization Heuristics with an Application to Knapsack Problems · Introduction · 0.93

  • The QAOA is a popular variational algorithm inspired by the adiabatic theorem, devised to produce approximate solutions for combinatorial optimization problems [ref] .

    A Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm · Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) · 0.94

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.