Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

SoK: Data Privacy in Virtual Reality

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2301.05940 v2 pith:O4CNZZYH submitted 2023-01-14 cs.HC cs.CR

classification cs.HCcs.CR
keywords dataprivacyadversariesmetaverserealityresearchthreatsvarious
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The adoption of virtual reality (VR) technologies has rapidly gained momentum in recent years as companies around the world begin to position the so-called "metaverse" as the next major medium for accessing and interacting with the internet. While consumers have become accustomed to a degree of data harvesting on the web, the real-time nature of data sharing in the metaverse indicates that privacy concerns are likely to be even more prevalent in the new "Web 3.0." Research into VR privacy has demonstrated that a plethora of sensitive personal information is observable by various would-be adversaries from just a few minutes of telemetry data. On the other hand, we have yet to see VR parallels for many privacy-preserving tools aimed at mitigating threats on conventional platforms. This paper aims to systematize knowledge on the landscape of VR privacy threats and countermeasures by proposing a comprehensive taxonomy of data attributes, protections, and adversaries based on the study of 68 collected publications. We complement our qualitative discussion with a statistical analysis of the risk associated with various data sources inherent to VR in consideration of the known attacks and defenses. By focusing on highlighting the clear outstanding opportunities, we hope to motivate and guide further research into this increasingly important field.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. From Perception to Protection: A Developer-Centered Study of Security and Privacy Threats in Extended Reality (XR)

    cs.CR 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A 23-developer interview study shows professional XR developers recall few XR-specific threats unprompted, rate unfamiliar attacks lower, and exhibit awareness gaps plus diffusion of responsibility.

  2. SoK: Come Together -- Unifying Security, Information Theory, and Cognition for a Mixed Reality Deception Attack Ontology & Analysis Framework

    cs.CR 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The authors construct the MR Deception Analysis Framework, an ontology plus two conceptual models for analyzing deception attacks in Mixed Reality.

  3. VReaves: Eavesdropping on Virtual Reality App Identity and Activity via Electromagnetic Side Channels

    cs.NI 2025-06 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    Electromagnetic emanations from a VR headset can be classified with a nearby software-defined radio and a fine-tuned ResNet to identify the running VR app and the user's activity, with a claimed accuracy near 99%.

Pith tools