Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

tasksource: A Dataset Harmonization Framework for Streamlined NLP Multi-Task Learning and Evaluation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2301.05948 v3 pith:TDGKLRGH submitted 2023-01-14 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords datasetsdatasetevaluationframeworkannotationsharmonizationmulti-tasktasksource
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The HuggingFace Datasets Hub hosts thousands of datasets, offering exciting opportunities for language model training and evaluation. However, datasets for a specific task type often have different schemas, making harmonization challenging. Multi-task training or evaluation necessitates manual work to fit data into task templates. Several initiatives independently tackle this issue by releasing harmonized datasets or providing harmonization codes to preprocess datasets into a consistent format. We identify patterns across previous preprocessing efforts, such as column name mapping and extracting specific sub-fields from structured data in a column. We then propose a structured annotation framework that ensures our annotations are fully exposed and not hidden within unstructured code. We release a dataset annotation framework and dataset annotations for more than 500 English tasks\footnote{\url{https://github.com/sileod/tasksource}}. These annotations include metadata, such as the names of columns to be used as input or labels for all datasets, which can save time for future dataset preprocessing, regardless of whether our framework is utilized. We fine-tune a multi-task text encoder on all tasksource tasks, outperforming every publicly available text encoder of comparable size in an external evaluation.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Leak@$k$: Unlearning Does Not Make LLMs Forget Under Probabilistic Decoding

    cs.LG 2025-11 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    LLM unlearning methods that pass greedy-decoding benchmarks leak forgotten facts when the model is sampled repeatedly, and the new leak@k metric quantifies this.

  2. R-TOFU: Unlearning in Large Reasoning Models

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    R-TOFU shows that answer-level unlearning is insufficient for large reasoning models because residual knowledge persists in chain-of-thought traces.

  3. FActBench: A Benchmark for Fine-grained Automatic Evaluation of LLM-Generated Text in the Medical Domain

    cs.CL 2025-09 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Unanimous voting between NLI and chain-of-thought fact-checking yields scores closest to medical expert judgments on three of four tasks in the new FActBench benchmark.

Pith tools