Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

ExaRanker: Explanation-Augmented Neural Ranker

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2301.10521 v2 pith:GO7K56H3 submitted 2023-01-25 cs.CL cs.AIcs.IR

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.IR
keywords explanationsmodelexarankerexamplesfinetunedneuralrankingwork
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent work has shown that inducing a large language model (LLM) to generate explanations prior to outputting an answer is an effective strategy to improve performance on a wide range of reasoning tasks. In this work, we show that neural rankers also benefit from explanations. We use LLMs such as GPT-3.5 to augment retrieval datasets with explanations and train a sequence-to-sequence ranking model to output a relevance label and an explanation for a given query-document pair. Our model, dubbed ExaRanker, finetuned on a few thousand examples with synthetic explanations performs on par with models finetuned on 3x more examples without explanations. Furthermore, the ExaRanker model incurs no additional computational cost during ranking and allows explanations to be requested on demand.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. PaSa: An LLM Agent for Comprehensive Academic Paper Search

    cs.IR 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    PaSa, a two-agent LLM system trained with session-level RL, reports substantially higher recall than existing academic search baselines on complex paper-finding queries.

  2. Towards Trustworthy Retrieval Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Survey

    cs.CL 2025-02 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A survey organizes current research on trustworthy RAG into six pillars, reliability, privacy, safety, fairness, explainability, and accountability, and maps methods, metrics, and open problems for each.

Pith tools