REVIEW 1 cited by
Are Equivariant Equilibrium Approximators Beneficial?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Recently, remarkable progress has been made by approximating Nash equilibrium (NE), correlated equilibrium (CE), and coarse correlated equilibrium (CCE) through function approximation that trains a neural network to predict equilibria from game representations. Furthermore, equivariant architectures are widely adopted in designing such equilibrium approximators in normal-form games. In this paper, we theoretically characterize benefits and limitations of equivariant equilibrium approximators. For the benefits, we show that they enjoy better generalizability than general ones and can achieve better approximations when the payoff distribution is permutation-invariant. For the limitations, we discuss their drawbacks in terms of equilibrium selection and social welfare. Together, our results help to understand the role of equivariance in equilibrium approximators.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Permutation Equivariant Model-based Offline Reinforcement Learning for Auto-bidding
PE-MORL combines a permutation equivariant learned auction environment with a pessimistically penalized Q-learning objective and reports 3.9-7.2% GMV gains over three baselines in deployed Taobao A/B tests.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.