Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Bayesian Self-Supervised Contrastive Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2301.11673 v4 pith:JJJ6S45T submitted 2023-01-27 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords negativecontrastivelosssamplessamplingself-supervisedbayesiandesired
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent years have witnessed many successful applications of contrastive learning in diverse domains, yet its self-supervised version still remains many exciting challenges. As the negative samples are drawn from unlabeled datasets, a randomly selected sample may be actually a false negative to an anchor, leading to incorrect encoder training. This paper proposes a new self-supervised contrastive loss called the BCL loss that still uses random samples from the unlabeled data while correcting the resulting bias with importance weights. The key idea is to design the desired sampling distribution for sampling hard true negative samples under the Bayesian framework. The prominent advantage lies in that the desired sampling distribution is a parametric structure, with a location parameter for debiasing false negative and concentration parameter for mining hard negative, respectively. Experiments validate the effectiveness and superiority of the BCL loss.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Probabilistic Model for Non-Contrastive Learning

    cs.LG 2025-01 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    A Gaussian generative model of positive pairs has a maximum likelihood estimator that equals PCA under isotropic augmentation noise and equals the simple non-contrastive SSL loss under orthogonal noise.

Pith tools