Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Adversarial Attacks on Adversarial Bandits

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2301.12595 v1 pith:YUYWCIA6 submitted 2023-01-30 cs.LG cs.CR

classification cs.LGcs.CR
keywords attackadversarialalgorithmattackerbanditboundablebandits
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We study a security threat to adversarial multi-armed bandits, in which an attacker perturbs the loss or reward signal to control the behavior of the victim bandit player. We show that the attacker is able to mislead any no-regret adversarial bandit algorithm into selecting a suboptimal target arm in every but sublinear (T-o(T)) number of rounds, while incurring only sublinear (o(T)) cumulative attack cost. This result implies critical security concern in real-world bandit-based systems, e.g., in online recommendation, an attacker might be able to hijack the recommender system and promote a desired product. Our proposed attack algorithms require knowledge of only the regret rate, thus are agnostic to the concrete bandit algorithm employed by the victim player. We also derived a theoretical lower bound on the cumulative attack cost that any victim-agnostic attack algorithm must incur. The lower bound matches the upper bound achieved by our attack, which shows that our attack is asymptotically optimal.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Optimism as a Vulnerability: Deceptive Stackelberg Control of UCB Bandit Followers

    cs.GT 2026-06 conditional novelty 6.5 of 10

    Under targetability and exploitability, a two-phase honeypot-then-trap leader strictly exceeds the classical SSE utility ceiling against a UCB follower at O(sqrt(T ln T)) signaling cost.

Pith tools