Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Simulating lossy Gaussian boson sampling with matrix product operators

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2301.12814 v4 pith:RBPW4S4N submitted 2023-01-30 quant-ph cs.CCphysics.comp-ph

classification quant-phcs.CCphysics.comp-ph
keywords bosongaussiansamplingnumberphotontensorcomplexityentanglement
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Gaussian boson sampling, a computational model that is widely believed to admit quantum supremacy, has already been experimentally demonstrated and is claimed to surpass the classical simulation capabilities of even the most powerful supercomputers today. However, whether the current approach limited by photon loss and noise in such experiments prescribes a scalable path to quantum advantage is an open question. To understand the effect of photon loss on the scalability of Gaussian boson sampling, we analytically derive the asymptotic operator entanglement entropy scaling, which relates to the simulation complexity. As a result, we observe that efficient tensor network simulations are likely possible under the $N_\text{out}\propto\sqrt{N}$ scaling of the number of surviving photons orange$N_\text{out}$ in the number of input photons $N$. We numerically verify this result using a tensor network algorithm with $U(1)$ symmetry, and overcome previous challenges due to the large local Hilbert space dimensions in Gaussian boson sampling with hardware acceleration. Additionally, we observe that increasing the photon number through larger squeezing does not increase the entanglement entropy significantly. Finally, we numerically find the bond dimension necessary for fixed accuracy simulations, providing more direct evidence for the complexity of tensor networks.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools