REVIEW 1 cited by
An AMM minimizing user-level extractable value and loss-versus-rebalancing
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We present V0LVER, an AMM protocol which solves an incentivization trilemma between users, passive liquidity providers, and block producers. V0LVER enables users and passive liquidity providers to interact without paying MEV or incurring uncontrolled loss-versus-rebalancing to the block producer. V0LVER is an AMM protocol built on an encrypted transaction mempool, where transactions are decrypted after being allocated liquidity by the AMM. V0LVER ensures this liquidity, given some external market price, is provided at that price in expectancy. This is done by incentivizing the block producer to move the pool price to the external market price. With this, users transact in expectancy at the external market price in exchange for a fee, with AMMs providing liquidity in expectancy at the external market price. Under block producer and liquidity provider competition, all of the fees in V0LVER approach zero. Without block producer arbitrage, V0LVER guarantees fall back to those of an AMM, albeit free from loss-versus-rebalancing and user-level MEV.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Reveal, Correct, Then Pay: Encrypted Mempools and Perpetual Funding Security
In commit-then-reveal mempools, a self-authored trade is hidden from the arbitrageurs who would correct it, so perpetual-futures funding distortion is amplified; privacy can therefore increase manipulation value despi...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.