Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Findings of the TSAR-2022 Shared Task on Multilingual Lexical Simplification

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2302.02888 v1 pith:U4PAKV6R submitted 2023-02-06 cs.CL cs.LG

Horacio Saggion , Sanja Štajner , Daniel Ferrés , Kim Cheng Sheang , Matthew Shardlow , Kai North , Marcos Zampieri This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CLcs.LG
keywords simplificationlexicaltaskmultilingualresultssharedtsar-2022english
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We report findings of the TSAR-2022 shared task on multilingual lexical simplification, organized as part of the Workshop on Text Simplification, Accessibility, and Readability TSAR-2022 held in conjunction with EMNLP 2022. The task called the Natural Language Processing research community to contribute with methods to advance the state of the art in multilingual lexical simplification for English, Portuguese, and Spanish. A total of 14 teams submitted the results of their lexical simplification systems for the provided test data. Results of the shared task indicate new benchmarks in Lexical Simplification with English lexical simplification quantitative results noticeably higher than those obtained for Spanish and (Brazilian) Portuguese.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Redefining Simplicity: Benchmarking Large Language Models from Lexical to Document Simplification

    cs.CL 2025-02 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    In a four-task benchmark, GPT-4o, Llama3.1-70B, and Gemma2-2B outperform traditional text simplification systems on most automatic metrics, and GPT-4o is preferred over human-written references in a small human study.

Pith tools