Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Vorticity cascade and turbulent drag in wall-bounded flows: plane Poiseuille flow

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2302.03738 v2 pith:UACWTQKM submitted 2023-02-07 physics.flu-dyn physics.comp-ph

Vorticity cascade and turbulent drag in wall-bounded flows: plane Poiseuille flow

classification physics.flu-dyn physics.comp-ph
keywords vorticityspanwisetransportfluxmechanismturbulentvorticeswall
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Drag for wall-bounded flows is directly related to flux of spanwise vorticity outward from the wall. In turbulent flows a key contribution arises from cross-stream "vorticity cascade" by nonlinear advection and stretching of vorticity. We study this process using numerical simulation data of turbulent channel flow at $Re_\tau=1000$. The net transfer from the wall of fresh spanwise vorticity created by downstream pressure drop is due to two large opposing fluxes, one which is "down-gradient" or outward from the wall, where most vorticity concentrates, and the other which is "up-gradient" or toward the wall and acting against strong viscous diffusion in the near-wall region. We present evidence that the up-gradient transport occurs by a mechanism of correlated inflow and spanwise vortex stretching that was proposed by Lighthill. This mechanism is essentially Lagrangian, but we explicate its relation to the Eulerian anti-symmetric vorticity flux tensor. As evidence for the mechanism we study (i) statistical correlations of the wall-normal velocity and of wall-normal flux of spanwise vorticity, (ii) vorticity flux cospectra that identify eddies involved in nonlinear vorticity transport in the two opposing directions, and (iii) visualizations of coherent vortex structures which contribute dominantly to the transport. The "D-type" vortices contributing dominantly to down-gradient transport in the log-layer are found to be attached, hairpin-type vortices. However, the "U-type" vortices contributing dominantly to up-gradient transport are detached, wall-parallel, pancake-shaped vortices with strong spanwise vorticity, as expected by Lighthill's mechanism. We discuss modifications to the attached eddy model and implications for turbulent drag reduction.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.