Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Feature Likelihood Divergence: Evaluating the Generalization of Generative Models Using Samples

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2302.04440 v4 pith:XXIFXVIZ submitted 2023-02-09 cs.LG cs.CV

classification cs.LGcs.CV
keywords metricsmodelsgenerativesamplesabilitycomprehensivedivergenceevaluating
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

The past few years have seen impressive progress in the development of deep generative models capable of producing high-dimensional, complex, and photo-realistic data. However, current methods for evaluating such models remain incomplete: standard likelihood-based metrics do not always apply and rarely correlate with perceptual fidelity, while sample-based metrics, such as FID, are insensitive to overfitting, i.e., inability to generalize beyond the training set. To address these limitations, we propose a new metric called the Feature Likelihood Divergence (FLD), a parametric sample-based metric that uses density estimation to provide a comprehensive trichotomic evaluation accounting for novelty (i.e., different from the training samples), fidelity, and diversity of generated samples. We empirically demonstrate the ability of FLD to identify overfitting problem cases, even when previously proposed metrics fail. We also extensively evaluate FLD on various image datasets and model classes, demonstrating its ability to match intuitions of previous metrics like FID while offering a more comprehensive evaluation of generative models. Code is available at https://github.com/marcojira/fld.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. HistoFID- Calibrating Frechet-distance evaluation across pathology foundation models

    eess.IV 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Raw Fréchet distances in pathology vary ~30-fold across encoders; dividing by each encoder's own within-cohort floor cuts cross-encoder variation by ~89% within and ~58% across cohorts.

Pith tools