Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

A Systematic Literature Review of Human-Centered, Ethical, and Responsible AI

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2302.05284 v3 pith:UWQH6PGR submitted 2023-02-10 cs.HC cs.AIcs.CY

classification cs.HCcs.AIcs.CY
keywords researchethicalgovernancehumanconferencesflourishinghcer-aiprivacy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

As Artificial Intelligence (AI) continues to advance rapidly, it becomes increasingly important to consider AI's ethical and societal implications. In this paper, we present a bottom-up mapping of the current state of research at the intersection of Human-Centered AI, Ethical, and Responsible AI (HCER-AI) by thematically reviewing and analyzing 164 research papers from leading conferences in ethical, social, and human factors of AI: AIES, CHI, CSCW, and FAccT. The ongoing research in HCER-AI places emphasis on governance, fairness, and explainability. These conferences, however, concentrate on specific themes rather than encompassing all aspects. While AIES has fewer papers on HCER-AI, it emphasizes governance and rarely publishes papers about privacy, security, and human flourishing. FAccT publishes more on governance and lacks papers on privacy, security, and human flourishing. CHI and CSCW, as more established conferences, have a broader research portfolio. We find that the current emphasis on governance and fairness in AI research may not adequately address the potential unforeseen and unknown implications of AI. Therefore, we recommend that future research should expand its scope and diversify resources to prepare for these potential consequences. This could involve exploring additional areas such as privacy, security, human flourishing, and explainability.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Design Patterns of Human-AI Interfaces in Healthcare

    cs.HC 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The paper synthesizes 15 information entities and 12 design patterns from 43 papers, then uses interviews and a designer workshop to argue these patterns support healthcare human-AI interface design.

  2. Understanding Gender Bias in AI-Generated Product Descriptions

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    AI-generated product descriptions on eBay show systematic gender bias, including body-size exclusions, stereotyped feature emphasis, and differences in calls to action.

Pith tools