REVIEW 2 cited by
MeV Gamma-Ray Constraints for Light Dark Matter from Semi-Annihilation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Exploring the realm of Dark Matter research, Light DM, which has a mass in the range of 1 MeV to 1 GeV, is a fascinating topic both theoretically and experimentally. We assume that the light dark matter is composed of complex scalars and produced from semi-annihilation, which is close to the scale of the MeV Gamma-ray satellite, allowing us to explore the implications of this hypothesis. The experimental data we used to constrain the scenario is from five different sources: the COMPTEL, EGRET, INTEGRAL, Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope, and the e-ASTROGAM future reach. We use the analytical formula to measure the X-ray spectra allowing us to determine the annihilation cross-section bounds from $10^{-28}\mathrm{cm}^3/\mathrm{s}$ to $10^{-22}\mathrm{cm}^3/\mathrm{s}$ for different combinations of dark matter and mediator masses. We found that the MeV gamma-ray provides valuable insight into the structure of the semi-annihilation dark matter, where EGRET contributes to the stringent constraint to the semi-annihilation, and the e-ASTROGAM future reach could probe the whole parameter space of the model.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Topological Freeze-out by Semi-Annihilation
A dark QCD sector with gauged baryon number yields a p-wave semi-annihilation channel that can set the dark matter relic abundance for pion masses between 10 MeV and 1 TeV.
-
Neutrino lines and photon continua from cascade dark matter decay
In cascade dark-matter decay, neutrino-line searches can beat gamma-ray limits whenever the intermediate mediator is long-lived enough to suppress the photon flux.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.