Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Parameter-efficient Modularised Bias Mitigation via AdapterFusion

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2302.06321 v2 pith:4HI5UWKJ submitted 2023-02-13 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords modelbiasdebiasingmitigationadapterfusionapproachbiasesdebiased
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large pre-trained language models contain societal biases and carry along these biases to downstream tasks. Current in-processing bias mitigation approaches (like adversarial training) impose debiasing by updating a model's parameters, effectively transferring the model to a new, irreversible debiased state. In this work, we propose a novel approach to develop stand-alone debiasing functionalities separate from the model, which can be integrated into the model on-demand, while keeping the core model untouched. Drawing from the concept of AdapterFusion in multi-task learning, we introduce DAM (Debiasing with Adapter Modules) - a debiasing approach to first encapsulate arbitrary bias mitigation functionalities into separate adapters, and then add them to the model on-demand in order to deliver fairness qualities. We conduct a large set of experiments on three classification tasks with gender, race, and age as protected attributes. Our results show that DAM improves or maintains the effectiveness of bias mitigation, avoids catastrophic forgetting in a multi-attribute scenario, and maintains on-par task performance, while granting parameter-efficiency and easy switching between the original and debiased models.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Deontological Keyword Bias: The Impact of Modal Expressions on Normative Judgments of Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    LLMs systematically treat modal words like 'must' as evidence of obligation even in non-obligatory contexts, more strongly than humans, and a few-shot plus reasoning prompt can lower the rate of such judgments.

Pith tools