Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

simpleKT: A Simple But Tough-to-Beat Baseline for Knowledge Tracing

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2302.06881 v2 pith:RGJQKBZV submitted 2023-02-14 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords baselinemodelknowledgesimplebecomecapturecitepdifferent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Knowledge tracing (KT) is the problem of predicting students' future performance based on their historical interactions with intelligent tutoring systems. Recently, many works present lots of special methods for applying deep neural networks to KT from different perspectives like model architecture, adversarial augmentation and etc., which make the overall algorithm and system become more and more complex. Furthermore, due to the lack of standardized evaluation protocol \citep{liu2022pykt}, there is no widely agreed KT baselines and published experimental comparisons become inconsistent and self-contradictory, i.e., the reported AUC scores of DKT on ASSISTments2009 range from 0.721 to 0.821 \citep{minn2018deep,yeung2018addressing}. Therefore, in this paper, we provide a strong but simple baseline method to deal with the KT task named \textsc{simpleKT}. Inspired by the Rasch model in psychometrics, we explicitly model question-specific variations to capture the individual differences among questions covering the same set of knowledge components that are a generalization of terms of concepts or skills needed for learners to accomplish steps in a task or a problem. Furthermore, instead of using sophisticated representations to capture student forgetting behaviors, we use the ordinary dot-product attention function to extract the time-aware information embedded in the student learning interactions. Extensive experiments show that such a simple baseline is able to always rank top 3 in terms of AUC scores and achieve 57 wins, 3 ties and 16 loss against 12 DLKT baseline methods on 7 public datasets of different domains. We believe this work serves as a strong baseline for future KT research. Code is available at \url{https://github.com/pykt-team/pykt-toolkit}\footnote{We merged our model to the \textsc{pyKT} benchmark at \url{https://pykt.org/}.}.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 24 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. A Hierarchical Probabilistic Framework for Incremental Knowledge Tracing in Classroom Settings

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A hidden Markov tree over knowledge concepts with EM and one-step incremental updates outperforms deep and LLM knowledge tracing baselines in low-resource online classroom simulations.

  2. LiveGraph: Active-Structure Neural Re-ranking for Exercise Recommendation

    cs.IR 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    LiveGraph re-ranks exercise recommendations with a dynamic concept kernel and uncertainty-aware meta-RL fusion, claiming improved accuracy and diversity, with only accuracy tables shown.

  3. AlignKT: Explicitly Modeling Knowledge State for Knowledge Tracing with Ideal State Alignment

    cs.AI 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    AlignKT improves knowledge tracing accuracy on two datasets by explicitly aligning a learned knowledge state with a hand-defined ideal of full mastery.

  4. Cuff-KT: Tackling Learners' Real-time Learning Pattern Adjustment via Tuning-Free Knowledge State Guided Model Updating

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Cuff-KT generates personalized output-layer parameters for knowledge tracing models without fine-tuning, reporting AUC improvements of about 10% and 4% under intra- and inter-learner shifts.

Pith tools