Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Attacks in Adversarial Machine Learning: A Systematic Survey from the Life-cycle Perspective

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2302.09457 v2 pith:EKQGZ4P2 submitted 2023-02-19 cs.LG cs.CR

classification cs.LGcs.CR
keywords adversarialattacklearningmachineparadigmsoccurringunifiedframework
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Adversarial machine learning (AML) studies the adversarial phenomenon of machine learning, which may make inconsistent or unexpected predictions with humans. Some paradigms have been recently developed to explore this adversarial phenomenon occurring at different stages of a machine learning system, such as backdoor attack occurring at the pre-training, in-training and inference stage; weight attack occurring at the post-training, deployment and inference stage; adversarial attack occurring at the inference stage. However, although these adversarial paradigms share a common goal, their developments are almost independent, and there is still no big picture of AML. In this work, we aim to provide a unified perspective to the AML community to systematically review the overall progress of this field. We firstly provide a general definition about AML, and then propose a unified mathematical framework to covering existing attack paradigms. According to the proposed unified framework, we build a full taxonomy to systematically categorize and review existing representative methods for each paradigm. Besides, using this unified framework, it is easy to figure out the connections and differences among different attack paradigms, which may inspire future researchers to develop more advanced attack paradigms. Finally, to facilitate the viewing of the built taxonomy and the related literature in adversarial machine learning, we further provide a website, \ie, \url{http://adversarial-ml.com}, where the taxonomies and literature will be continuously updated.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. MedFedPure: A Medical Federated Framework with MAE-based Detection and Diffusion Purification for Inference-Time Attacks

    cs.LG 2025-11 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A client-side test-time defense combining MAE detection with diffusion purification raises federated MRI tumor-classifier adversarial accuracy from 49.5% to 87.3% under bounded PGD attacks.

  2. Leveraging Trustworthy AI for Automotive Security in Multi-Domain Operations: Towards a Responsive Human-AI Multi-Domain Task Force for Cyber Social Security

    cs.CR 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Larger Random Forest and Gradient Boosting ensembles increase the time needed for a ZOO black-box attack on a CAN bus IDS, while XGBoost shows no clear relationship.

Pith tools