REVIEW 1 cited by
Pseudo Contrastive Learning for Graph-based Semi-supervised Learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Pseudo Labeling is a technique used to improve the performance of semi-supervised Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) by generating additional pseudo-labels based on confident predictions. However, the quality of generated pseudo-labels has been a longstanding concern due to the sensitivity of the classification objective with respect to the given labels. To avoid the untrustworthy classification supervision indicating ``a node belongs to a specific class,'' we favor the fault-tolerant contrasting supervision demonstrating ``two nodes do not belong to the same class.'' Thus, the problem of generating high-quality pseudo-labels is then transformed into a relaxed version, i.e., identifying reliable negative pairs. To achieve this, we propose a general framework for GNNs, termed Pseudo Contrastive Learning (PCL). It separates two nodes whose positive and negative pseudo-labels target the same class. To incorporate topological knowledge into learning, we devise a topologically weighted contrastive loss that spends more effort separating negative pairs with smaller topological distances. Experimentally, we apply PCL to various GNNs, which consistently outperform their counterparts using other popular general techniques on five real-world graphs.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
ProGMLP: A Progressive Framework for GNN-to-MLP Knowledge Distillation with Efficient Trade-offs
ProGMLP trains a sequence of MLPs with progressive distillation and mixup, enabling flexible accuracy-speed trade-offs for graph node classification in one framework.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.