REVIEW 2 cited by
mSAM: Micro-Batch-Averaged Sharpness-Aware Minimization
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
mSAM: Micro-Batch-Averaged Sharpness-Aware Minimization
read the original abstract
Modern deep learning models are over-parameterized, where different optima can result in widely varying generalization performance. The Sharpness-Aware Minimization (SAM) technique modifies the fundamental loss function that steers gradient descent methods toward flatter minima, which are believed to exhibit enhanced generalization prowess. Our study delves into a specific variant of SAM known as micro-batch SAM (mSAM). This variation involves aggregating updates derived from adversarial perturbations across multiple shards (micro-batches) of a mini-batch during training. We extend a recently developed and well-studied general framework for flatness analysis to theoretically show that SAM achieves flatter minima than SGD, and mSAM achieves even flatter minima than SAM. We provide a thorough empirical evaluation of various image classification and natural language processing tasks to substantiate this theoretical advancement. We also show that contrary to previous work, mSAM can be implemented in a flexible and parallelizable manner without significantly increasing computational costs. Our implementation of mSAM yields superior generalization performance across a wide range of tasks compared to SAM, further supporting our theoretical framework.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
LSAM: Asynchronous Distributed Training with Landscape-Smoothed Sharpness-Aware Minimization
LSAM combines SAM's sharpness-aware objective with an EASGD-style asynchronous sampling scheme and claims SGD-rate convergence plus better accuracy than data-parallel SAM.
-
Domain-Generalization to Improve Learning in Meta-Learning Algorithms
DGS-MAML layers gradient matching onto SharpMAML and claims O(1/T) convergence and tighter PAC-Bayes bounds, but the displayed theorems give O(1/sqrt T) under the paper's own parameter choices.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.