Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Two Views of Constrained Differential Privacy: Belief Revision and Update

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2303.00228 v1 pith:ZQNQKKDB submitted 2023-03-01 cs.CR cs.LG

classification cs.CRcs.LG
keywords beliefconstrainedrevisionupdatealgorithmsdifferentialespeciallyhence
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this paper, we provide two views of constrained differential private (DP) mechanisms. The first one is as belief revision. A constrained DP mechanism is obtained by standard probabilistic conditioning, and hence can be naturally implemented by Monte Carlo algorithms. The other is as belief update. A constrained DP is defined according to l2-distance minimization postprocessing or projection and hence can be naturally implemented by optimization algorithms. The main advantage of these two perspectives is that we can make full use of the machinery of belief revision and update to show basic properties for constrained differential privacy especially some important new composition properties. Within the framework established in this paper, constrained DP algorithms in the literature can be classified either as belief revision or belief update. At the end of the paper, we demonstrate their differences especially in utility in a couple of scenarios.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools