Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

What Would Trojans Do? Exploiting Partial-Information Vulnerabilities in Autonomous Vehicle Sensing

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2303.03470 v4 pith:QXNFFT64 submitted 2023-03-06 cs.CR cs.SYeess.SY

classification cs.CRcs.SYeess.SY
keywords attackssensorfusionlidarvulnerabilitiesattackautonomouscamera
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Safety-critical sensors in autonomous vehicles (AVs) form an essential part of the vehicle's trusted computing base (TCB), yet they are highly susceptible to attacks. Alarmingly, Tier 1 manufacturers have already exposed vulnerabilities to attacks introducing Trojans that can stealthily alter sensor outputs. We analyze the feasible capability and safety-critical outcomes of an attack on sensing at a cyber level. To further address these threats, we design realistic attacks in AV simulators and real-world datasets under two practical constraints: attackers (1) possess only partial information and (2) are constrained by data structures that maintain sensor integrity.Examining the role of camera and LiDAR in multi-sensor AVs, we find that attacks targeting only the camera have minimal safety impact due to the sensor fusion system's strong reliance on 3D data from LiDAR. This reliance makes LiDAR-based attacks especially detrimental to safety. To mitigate the vulnerabilities, we introduce security-aware sensor fusion incorporating (1) a probabilistic data-asymmetry monitor and (2) a scalable track-to-track fusion of 3D LiDAR and monocular detections (T2T-3DLM). We demonstrate that these methods significantly diminish attack success rate.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Trusted Data Fusion, Multi-Agent Autonomy, Autonomous Vehicles

    eess.SY 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A Beta-distribution, hidden Markov trust estimator plus trust-weighted covariance intersection improves simulated multi-UAV surveillance under false-positive and false-negative attacks.

  2. Assured Autonomy with Neuro-Symbolic Perception

    cs.AI 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Comparing camera-derived and LiDAR-derived scene graphs can expose a stealthy class of LiDAR attacks, demonstrated qualitatively on CARLA and nuScenes scenes within a proposed neuro-symbolic perception framework.

Pith tools