Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Interpretable Visual Question Answering Referring to Outside Knowledge

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · Submitted 8 Mar 2023

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Experimental results show that our model can outperform state-of-the-art methods regarding answer accuracy and explanation rationality.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2303.04388 (version 1)
Pith IDIQXFLIDB, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationHe Zhu, Miki Haseyama, Ren Togo, Takahiro Ogawa. "Interpretable Visual Question Answering Referring to Outside Knowledge." arXiv:2303.04388 (2023). https://pith.science/paper/IQXFLIDB
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,881 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.16 · states limitation 0.09 · human participants 0.06 · controlled comparison 0.54 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.05 · compares with prior results 0.93 · mentions code or data availability 0.03.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We present a novel multimodal interpretable VQA model that can answer the question more accurately and generate diverse explanations. Although researchers have proposed several methods that can generate human-readable and fine-grained natural language sentences to explain a model's decision, these methods have focused solely on the information in the image. Ideally, the model should refer to various information inside and outside the image to correctly generate explanations, just as we use background knowledge daily. The proposed method incorporates information from outside knowledge and multiple image captions to increase the diversity of information available to the model. The contribution of this paper is to construct an interpretable visual question answering model using multimodal inputs to improve the rationality of generated results. Experimental results show that our model can outperform state-of-the-art methods regarding answer accuracy and explanation rationality.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We present a novel multimodal interpretable VQA model that can answer the question more accurately and generate diverse explanations. contribution 0.99 0.90 0.29 asserted 0.98
s1 Although researchers have proposed several methods that can generate human-readable and fine-grained natural language sentences to explain a model's decision, these methods have focused solely on the information in the image. gap 0.83 0.06 0.03 asserted 1.00
s2 Ideally, the model should refer to various information inside and outside the image to correctly generate explanations, just as we use background knowledge daily. gap 0.56 0.05 0.07 asserted 0.59
s3 The proposed method incorporates information from outside knowledge and multiple image captions to increase the diversity of information available to the model. method 0.92 0.85 0.07 asserted 1.00
s4 The contribution of this paper is to construct an interpretable visual question answering model using multimodal inputs to improve the rationality of generated results. contribution 1.00 0.82 0.16 asserted 0.99
s5 Experimental results show that our model can outperform state-of-the-art methods regarding answer accuracy and explanation rationality. result 1.00 0.96 0.75 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 1.00 · evidence from observation or experiment 0.99.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We present a novel multimodal interpretable VQA model that can answer the question more accurately and generate diverse explanations. Although researchers have proposed several methods that can generate human-readable and fine-grained natural language sentences to explain a model's decision, these methods have focused solely on the information in the image. Ideally, the model should refer to various information inside and outside the image to correctly generate explanations, just as we use background knowledge daily. The proposed method incorporates information from outside knowledge and multiple image captions to increase the diversity of information available to the model. The contribution of this paper is to construct an interpretable visual question answering model using multimodal inputs to improve the rationality of generated results. Experimental results show that our model can outperform state-of-the-art methods regarding answer accuracy and explanation rationality.

Human review
How the literature uses it

What this paper does with the arXiv papers it cites

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

What it cites

Uses the method or tool of 3 papers
Uses data or values from 1 paper
Cites as background 2 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.