REVIEW 2 cited by
Asymmetric Quantum Secure Multi-Party Computation With Weak Clients Against Dishonest Majority
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Secure multi-party computation (SMPC) protocols allow several parties that distrust each other to collectively compute a function on their inputs. In this paper, we introduce a protocol that lifts classical SMPC to quantum SMPC in a composably and statistically secure way, even for a single honest party. Unlike previous quantum SMPC protocols, our proposal only requires very limited quantum resources from all but one party; it suffices that the weak parties, i.e. the clients, are able to prepare single-qubit states in the X-Y plane. The novel quantum SMPC protocol is constructed in a naturally modular way, and relies on a new technique for quantum verification that is of independent interest. This verification technique requires the remote preparation of states only in a single plane of the Bloch sphere. In the course of proving the security of the new verification protocol, we also uncover a fundamental invariance that is inherent to measurement-based quantum computing.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Single-click protocols for remote state preparation using weak coherent pulses
Introduces single-click and double-single-click remote state preparation protocols for weak coherent pulse clients that achieve higher rates than the double-click protocol at comparable fidelity.
-
Verifiable blind quantum computing: Comparative analysis and design considerations for client architectures
Among information-theoretic MBQC VBQC clients, measurement-based RSP and cavity-reflection emission clients are the strongest near-term defaults once noise-robust security, rate, errors, and hardware cost are weighed ...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.