Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Report of the Medical Image De-Identification (MIDI) Task Group -- Best Practices and Recommendations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2303.10473 v3 pith:DNRMXPBV submitted 2023-03-18 cs.CR cs.CVeess.IV

classification cs.CRcs.CVeess.IV
keywords datade-identificationimagesmedicalobjectssharingconsidereddose
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This report addresses the technical aspects of de-identification of medical images of human subjects and biospecimens, such that re-identification risk of ethical, moral, and legal concern is sufficiently reduced to allow unrestricted public sharing for any purpose, regardless of the jurisdiction of the source and distribution sites. All medical images, regardless of the mode of acquisition, are considered, though the primary emphasis is on those with accompanying data elements, especially those encoded in formats in which the data elements are embedded, particularly Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM). These images include image-like objects such as Segmentations, Parametric Maps, and Radiotherapy (RT) Dose objects. The scope also includes related non-image objects, such as RT Structure Sets, Plans and Dose Volume Histograms, Structured Reports, and Presentation States. Only de-identification of publicly released data is considered, and alternative approaches to privacy preservation, such as federated learning for artificial intelligence (AI) model development, are out of scope, as are issues of privacy leakage from AI model sharing. Only technical issues of public sharing are addressed.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Medical Image De-Identification Benchmark Challenge

    cs.CV 2025-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    A multi-institution benchmark challenge scored ten DICOM de-identification pipelines on real radiology images with synthetic PHI/PII, with top accuracy near 99.9%.

  2. DICOM De-Identification via Hybrid AI and Rule-Based Framework for Scalable, Uncertainty-Aware Redaction

    stat.ML 2025-07 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    A rule-based and AI hybrid with uncertainty-aware detection reports 99.88% de-identification pass rate on its own DICOM, HIPAA, and TCIA checks.

Pith tools