REVIEW 2 cited by
Logic of Differentiable Logics: Towards a Uniform Semantics of DL
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Differentiable logics (DL) have recently been proposed as a method of training neural networks to satisfy logical specifications. A DL consists of a syntax in which specifications are stated and an interpretation function that translates expressions in the syntax into loss functions. These loss functions can then be used during training with standard gradient descent algorithms. The variety of existing DLs and the differing levels of formality with which they are treated makes a systematic comparative study of their properties and implementations difficult. This paper remedies this problem by suggesting a meta-language for defining DLs that we call the Logic of Differentiable Logics, or LDL. Syntactically, it generalises the syntax of existing DLs to FOL, and for the first time introduces the formalism for reasoning about vectors and learners. Semantically, it introduces a general interpretation function that can be instantiated to define loss functions arising from different existing DLs. We use LDL to establish several theoretical properties of existing DLs, and to conduct their empirical study in neural network verification.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Formally Verified Neurosymbolic Trajectory Learning via Tensor-based Linear Temporal Logic on Finite Traces
A formally verified Isabelle/HOL specification of tensor-based LTLf semantics yields a verified differentiable loss and derivative, automatically extracted to OCaml and used to train trajectory-planning networks in PyTorch.
-
Understanding the Logic of Direct Preference Alignment through Logic
Direct preference alignment losses can be expressed as logical programs over model predictions, yielding an organized landscape of billions of definable losses and a route to new variants.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.