Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

A Survey on Class Imbalance in Federated Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2303.11673 v1 pith:DWNMIVEV submitted 2023-03-21 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords learningdataimbalancefederatedclassprivacybeenclient
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Federated learning, which allows multiple client devices in a network to jointly train a machine learning model without direct exposure of clients' data, is an emerging distributed learning technique due to its nature of privacy preservation. However, it has been found that models trained with federated learning usually have worse performance than their counterparts trained in the standard centralized learning mode, especially when the training data is imbalanced. In the context of federated learning, data imbalance may occur either locally one one client device, or globally across many devices. The complexity of different types of data imbalance has posed challenges to the development of federated learning technique, especially considering the need of relieving data imbalance issue and preserving data privacy at the same time. Therefore, in the literature, many attempts have been made to handle class imbalance in federated learning. In this paper, we present a detailed review of recent advancements along this line. We first introduce various types of class imbalance in federated learning, after which we review existing methods for estimating the extent of class imbalance without the need of knowing the actual data to preserve data privacy. After that, we discuss existing methods for handling class imbalance in FL, where the advantages and disadvantages of the these approaches are discussed. We also summarize common evaluation metrics for class imbalanced tasks, and point out potential future directions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. FedWCM: Unleashing the Potential of Momentum-based Federated Learning in Long-Tailed Scenarios

    cs.LG 2025-07 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    FedWCM uses per-client data-distribution scores to adapt momentum and aggregation weights in federated learning, showing empirical gains over FedAvg and FedCM on long-tailed non-IID datasets, but its convergence proof...

  2. CADRE: Customizable Assurance of Data Readiness in Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning

    cs.CR 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    CADRE provides customizable data-readiness metrics, rules, remedies, and aggregated reports for privacy-preserving federated learning, demonstrated on six datasets.

  3. Poison to Detect: Detection of Targeted Overfitting in Federated Learning

    cs.CR 2025-09 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Clients can spot a selectively-aggregating server by planting flipped labels, backdoor triggers, or fingerprints in their updates and checking whether those signals survive in the returned model.

Pith tools