Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Survey on Adversarial Attack and Defense for Medical Image Analysis: Methods and Challenges

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2303.14133 v2 pith:OBPG2TVY submitted 2023-03-24 eess.IV cs.CRcs.CV

classification eess.IVcs.CRcs.CV
keywords medicaladversarialanalysisimagedefensesurveyattackdiagnosis
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Deep learning techniques have achieved superior performance in computer-aided medical image analysis, yet they are still vulnerable to imperceptible adversarial attacks, resulting in potential misdiagnosis in clinical practice. Oppositely, recent years have also witnessed remarkable progress in defense against these tailored adversarial examples in deep medical diagnosis systems. In this exposition, we present a comprehensive survey on recent advances in adversarial attacks and defenses for medical image analysis with a systematic taxonomy in terms of the application scenario. We also provide a unified framework for different types of adversarial attack and defense methods in the context of medical image analysis. For a fair comparison, we establish a new benchmark for adversarially robust medical diagnosis models obtained by adversarial training under various scenarios. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first survey paper that provides a thorough evaluation of adversarially robust medical diagnosis models. By analyzing qualitative and quantitative results, we conclude this survey with a detailed discussion of current challenges for adversarial attack and defense in medical image analysis systems to shed light on future research directions. Code is available on \href{https://github.com/tomvii/Adv_MIA}{\color{red}{GitHub}}.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Prompt2Perturb (P2P): Text-Guided Diffusion-Based Adversarial Attacks on Breast Ultrasound Images

    cs.CV 2024-12 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Prompt2Perturb finds Stable Diffusion text embeddings that turn breast ultrasound images into adversarial examples that are natural-looking and mislead classifiers.

Pith tools