Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

On Codex Prompt Engineering for OCL Generation: An Empirical Study

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2303.16244 v1 pith:5JWEMTX6 submitted 2023-03-28 cs.SE cs.AI

classification cs.SEcs.AI
keywords constraintsgeneratedcodexlanguagemodelscodefew-shotgeneration
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

The Object Constraint Language (OCL) is a declarative language that adds constraints and object query expressions to MOF models. Despite its potential to provide precision and conciseness to UML models, the unfamiliar syntax of OCL has hindered its adoption. Recent advancements in LLMs, such as GPT-3, have shown their capability in many NLP tasks, including semantic parsing and text generation. Codex, a GPT-3 descendant, has been fine-tuned on publicly available code from GitHub and can generate code in many programming languages. We investigate the reliability of OCL constraints generated by Codex from natural language specifications. To achieve this, we compiled a dataset of 15 UML models and 168 specifications and crafted a prompt template with slots to populate with UML information and the target task, using both zero- and few-shot learning methods. By measuring the syntactic validity and execution accuracy metrics of the generated OCL constraints, we found that enriching the prompts with UML information and enabling few-shot learning increases the reliability of the generated OCL constraints. Furthermore, the results reveal a close similarity based on sentence embedding between the generated OCL constraints and the human-written ones in the ground truth, implying a level of clarity and understandability in the generated OCL constraints by Codex.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Knowledge-Enhanced Program Repair for Data Science Code

    cs.SE 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    DSrepair combines a knowledge graph of data science APIs with AST-level bug localization to repair LLM-generated code, fixing more DS-1000 tasks than five baseline repair methods.

  2. Are requirements really all you need? A case study of LLM-driven configuration code generation for automotive simulations

    cs.SE 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    GPT-4o translates direct requirements into CARLA configuration code reliably, but fails on abstract requirements like pedestrian-vehicle synchronization even with chain-of-thought examples.

Pith tools