REVIEW 1 cited by
FineIBT: Fine-grain Control-flow Enforcement with Indirect Branch Tracking
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
FineIBT: Fine-grain Control-flow Enforcement with Indirect Branch Tracking
read the original abstract
We present the design, implementation, and evaluation of FineIBT: a CFI enforcement mechanism that improves the precision of hardware-assisted CFI solutions, like Intel IBT, by instrumenting program code to reduce the valid/allowed targets of indirect forward-edge transfers. We study the design of FineIBT on the x86-64 architecture, and implement and evaluate it on Linux and the LLVM toolchain. We designed FineIBT's instrumentation to be compact, incurring low runtime and memory overheads, and generic, so as to support different CFI policies. Our prototype implementation incurs negligible runtime slowdowns ($\approx$0%-1.94% in SPEC CPU2017 and $\approx$0%-1.92% in real-world applications) outperforming Clang-CFI. Lastly, we investigate the effectiveness/security and compatibility of FineIBT using the ConFIRM CFI benchmarking suite, demonstrating that our instrumentation provides complete coverage in the presence of modern software features, while supporting a wide range of CFI policies with the same, predictable performance.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Resolving Availability and Run-time Integrity Conflicts in Real-Time Embedded Systems
PAIR resolves the availability versus integrity trade-off in real-time systems by maintaining an Availability Region of safe tasks and using hardware interrupts to terminate only violating tasks with no run-time overhead.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.