Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

SAM vs BET: A Comparative Study for Brain Extraction and Segmentation of Magnetic Resonance Images using Deep Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2304.04738 v3 pith:J35GBJKQ submitted 2023-04-10 eess.IV cs.CVcs.LG

classification eess.IVcs.CVcs.LG
keywords brainextractionsegmentationcurrentdifferentimagelesionstissue
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Brain extraction is a critical preprocessing step in various neuroimaging studies, particularly enabling accurate separation of brain from non-brain tissue and segmentation of relevant within-brain tissue compartments and structures using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) data. FSL's Brain Extraction Tool (BET), although considered the current gold standard for automatic brain extraction, presents limitations and can lead to errors such as over-extraction in brains with lesions affecting the outer parts of the brain, inaccurate differentiation between brain tissue and surrounding meninges, and susceptibility to image quality issues. Recent advances in computer vision research have led to the development of the Segment Anything Model (SAM) by Meta AI, which has demonstrated remarkable potential in zero-shot segmentation of objects in real-world scenarios. In the current paper, we present a comparative analysis of brain extraction techniques comparing SAM with a widely used and current gold standard technique called BET on a variety of brain scans with varying image qualities, MR sequences, and brain lesions affecting different brain regions. We find that SAM outperforms BET based on average Dice coefficient, IoU and accuracy metrics, particularly in cases where image quality is compromised by signal inhomogeneities, non-isotropic voxel resolutions, or the presence of brain lesions that are located near (or involve) the outer regions of the brain and the meninges. In addition, SAM has also unsurpassed segmentation properties allowing a fine grain separation of different issue compartments and different brain structures. These results suggest that SAM has the potential to emerge as a more accurate, robust and versatile tool for a broad range of brain extraction and segmentation applications.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Sli2Vol+: Segmenting 3D Medical Images Based on an Object Estimation Guided Correspondence Flow Network

    cs.CV 2024-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Sli2Vol+ learns slice-to-slice correspondences with guidance from pseudo-labels, improving single-slice-annotated 3D segmentation over the Sli2Vol baseline by about 5.6 Dice points on CT and 3.5 on MRI.

  2. Self-Prompt SAM: Medical Image Segmentation via Automatic Prompt SAM Adaptation

    cs.CV 2025-02 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    Self-Prompt-SAM automatically generates point, box, and mask prompts for a fine-tuned SAM and reports state-of-the-art Dice scores on three medical segmentation benchmarks.

Pith tools